On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A 25% disk i/o decrease is very serious. Lets get some serious feedback
> from people running internet and database servers before we blow off
> the server users in order to compete with BEOS.
I think it's pretty serious for multimedia users as well... I for one could use
that extra headroom for getting multitrack streaming to/from disk reliable.
The reason for this decrease should be tracked down to see if it can be fixed.
BTW, any figures for RTLinux? If I had the time, I'd do some benchmarking, but
that'll have to wait for a few days...
//David
�A�U�D�I�A�L�I�T�Y� P r o f e s s i o n a l L i n u x A u d i o
- - ------------------------------------------------------------- - -
�Rock Solid David Olofson:
�Low Latency www.angelfire.com/or/audiality �Audio Hacker
�Plug-Ins [EMAIL PROTECTED] �Linux Advocate
�Open Source �Singer/Composer
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREA... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (&... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (&... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Low-latency pat... yodaiken
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Low-latency... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Low-la... yodaiken
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Lo... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9ms a... David Olofson
- Re: Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9ms audio ... Ingo Molnar
- Re: Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9ms a... Benno Senoner
