On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Joe Miklojcik wrote: > > > * "we think our hardware's proprietary secrets will be revealed > > > if there is a source code driver" > > Uh, isnt this what patents are for? If someone reverse engineers their > > card, they are *completely screwed* unless they have patent protection. > Shhh :) They haven't figured that out yet. It's the only thing saving us > on a lot of the hardware Linux supports. I'm not a lawyer, but I think that > they can deny the right to reverse engineer in a user license, which would > make some drivers illegal. So you reverse engineer them in a country where such shrinkwrap licenses themselves are illegal. Isnt this most of europe? :) Isnt there some precedent law in the US which basically says such licenses are unenforceable? -Dan
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Dan Hollis
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Dan Hollis
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Dan Hollis
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Dan Hollis
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) John Littler
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Joe Miklojcik
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) Dan Hollis
- Re: 4D-NXs (was Re: Sync Issues) David Olofson
- sequencer timing issues est
- Re: sequencer timing issues Paul Barton-Davis
- HZ > 100 overhead est
- Re: HZ > 100 overhead Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: HZ > 100 overhead Benno Senoner
- Re: HZ > 100 overhead Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: HZ > 100 overhead Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: HZ > 100 overhead Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: HZ > 100 overhead Benno Senoner
