[PATCH 1/6] Bitfield without explicit sign should be a warning, not an error

[Pavel Roskin]

The -Wdefault-bitfield-sign is supposed to control a warning, just like
other -W options.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 parse.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/parse.c b/parse.c
index cb9f87a..ab3a096 100644
--- a/parse.c
+++ b/parse.c
@@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ static struct token *handle_bitfield(struct token *token, 
struct symbol *decl)
                    !(bitfield_type->ctype.modifiers & MOD_EXPLICITLY_SIGNED) &&
                    is_signed) {
                        // The sign of bitfields is unspecified by default.
-                       sparse_error(token->pos, "dubious bitfield without 
explicit `signed' or `unsigned'");
+                       warning(token->pos, "dubious bitfield without explicit 
`signed' or `unsigned'");
                }
        }
        bitfield->bit_size = width;


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html