On Friday, October 25, 2013 03:18:59 PM Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> Current I2C adapter id - client address "x-00yy" based device naming scheme
> is not always stable enough to be used in name based matching, for instance
> within ALSA SoC subsystem.
>
> This is problematic in PC kind of platforms where I2C adapter numbers can
> change due variable amount of bus controllers, probe order, add-on cards or
> just because of BIOS settings.
>
> This patch addresses the problem by using the ACPI device name with
> "i2c-" prefix for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves. For them device name
> "x-00yz" becomes "i2c-INTABCD:ij" after this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <[email protected]>
> ---
> I'm not sure when would acpi_bus_get_device fail and how realistic is that
> here.
> I put minimalistic error handling here which just falls back to old
> adapter-addr naming scheme.
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 111b2c6..8d6f3e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -613,6 +613,25 @@ void i2c_unlock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_unlock_adapter);
>
> +static void i2c_dev_set_name(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> + struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
> + if (ACPI_HANDLE(&client->dev)) {
ACPI_HANDLE() already contains an "is CONFIG_ACPI enabled?" check, so the #if
around the if (ACPI_HANDLE()) {} is redundant.
Similarly for the SPI patch.
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> + if (!acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_HANDLE(&client->dev), &adev)) {
> + dev_set_name(&client->dev, "i2c-%s",
> + dev_name(&adev->dev));
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
> + /* For 10-bit clients, add an arbitrary offset to avoid collisions */
> + dev_set_name(&client->dev, "%d-%04x", i2c_adapter_id(adap),
> + client->addr | ((client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN)
> + ? 0xa000 : 0));
> +}
> +
> /**
> * i2c_new_device - instantiate an i2c device
> * @adap: the adapter managing the device
> @@ -671,10 +690,7 @@ i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct
> i2c_board_info const *info)
> client->dev.of_node = info->of_node;
> ACPI_HANDLE_SET(&client->dev, info->acpi_node.handle);
>
> - /* For 10-bit clients, add an arbitrary offset to avoid collisions */
> - dev_set_name(&client->dev, "%d-%04x", i2c_adapter_id(adap),
> - client->addr | ((client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN)
> - ? 0xa000 : 0));
> + i2c_dev_set_name(adap, client);
> status = device_register(&client->dev);
> if (status)
> goto out_err;
>
Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
