On 11/15/2013 04:24 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Julia Lawall [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:19 PM
>> To: Jingoo Han
>> Cc: 'Mark Brown'; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: devm_spi_register_master
>>
>> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Jingoo Han wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 2:45 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I was looking into the use of devm_spi_register_master.  This function
>>>> seems to take care of registering and unregistering, but not allocation
>>>> and freeing.  I have the impression that that is done with
>>>> spi_alloc_master and and spi_master_put, which are not managed functions.
>>>> But then I wonder how this can work?  It seems that the spi_master_put
>>>> function should remain in the probe or remove function, and then the
>>>> object could be freed before it is unregistered?
>>>>
>>>> The patch 2fe7e4add3e53df7c1b97e32076f8390dd81c6b3 introduces a call to
>>>> devm_spi_register_master and also removes a call to spi_master_put.  By my
>>>> reasoning, this would cause a memory leak.
>>> Hi Julia Lawall,
>>>
>>> I already checked that the patch 2fe7e4a "spi: txx9: use
>>> devm_spi_register_master()" is right. The call to spi_master_put()
>>> was duplicated. So, it should be removed.
>>>
>>> When removing the driver, the following functions are called.
>>> : devm_spi_unregister()
>>>        -> spi_unregister_master()
>>>            -> device_unregister()
>>>                -> put_device()
>>>
>>> Also, spi_master_put() calls the following functions.
>>> : spi_master_put()
>>>        -> put_device()
>>>
>>> So, put_device() is duplicated, when devm_spi_register_master()
>>> is used. In this case, spi_master_put() can be removed.
>> spi_register_master calls device_add, which seems to increment the
>> reference count.  So it may be that both calls to put_device are needed.
>> On the other hand, in that case it would be safe to invert their order.
>>
> Then, how about the following patch submitted by Wei Yongjun?
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg286576.html

spi_master_get() should be moved.

probe:
        spi_alloc_master                -> Init reference count to 1    => 1
        devm_spi_register_master        -> Not increment reference count => 1
        (It seems device_add() does not hold a reference)
remove:
        spi_master_get                  -> increment reference count => 2
        devm_spi_unregister             -> decrement reference count => 1

So after remove, the reference count still 1.

If devm_spi_register_master() hold a reference, we will need
a extra spi_master_put() in remove to let master be freed.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to