On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 13:30 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We refactored this code but accidentally left out a break statement so
> QUARK_X1000_SSP isn't handled correctly.
> 

Thanks for catching this!
One comment below.


> Fixes: 025ffe88ee60 ('spi: pxa2xx: shift clk_div in one place')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> index 60526a5..a081cfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> @@ -791,6 +791,7 @@ static unsigned int pxa2xx_ssp_get_clk_div(struct 
> driver_data *drv_data,
>       switch (drv_data->ssp_type) {
>       case QUARK_X1000_SSP:
>               clk_div = quark_x1000_get_clk_div(rate, &chip->dds_rate);
> +             break;
>       default:
>               clk_div = ssp_get_clk_div(drv_data, rate);

It would be nice to have a break here as well, but I think we also may
change this to if-else-if construction.

>       }

Whatever solution you choose
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

And actually 
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

Now run with time to see the difference.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to