On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 11:04:40PM +0000, Hans de Goede wrote: > Currently ehci-platform is only used in combination with devicetree when used > with some via socs. By extending it to (optionally) get clks and a phy from > devicetree, and enabling / disabling those on power_on / off, it can be used > more generically. Specifically after this commit it can be used for the > ehci controller on Allwinner sunxi SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-ehci.txt | 25 +++++ > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/vt8500-ehci.txt | 12 -- > drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c | 125 > +++++++++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-ehci.txt > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/vt8500-ehci.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-ehci.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-ehci.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..aba6da1 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-ehci.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ > +Generic Platform EHCI controller > + > +Required properties: > + - compatible: Should be "platform-ehci" > + (legacy: via,vt8500-ehci" or "wm,prizm-ehci")
Is there any reason for these to be considered legacy? New devices could just declare their compatibility with one of the existing implementations, e.g: ehci { compatible = "some-vendor,ehci", "via,vt8500-ehci"; ... } No new compatible string needed in the driver, and we can easily add quirks support later. I'm also not a fan of "platform-*" naming, it's leaking a Linux-internal implementation detail. > + - reg: Address range of the ehci registers. > + - interrupts: Should contain the ehci interrupt. > + > +Optional properties: > + - clocks: array of clocks > + - clock-names: clock names "ahb" and/or "ehci" It would be nice to define clocks in terms of clock-names, as with my OCHI comments. [...] > @@ -85,7 +159,7 @@ static int ehci_platform_probe(struct platform_device *dev) > > /* > * use reasonable defaults so platforms don't have to provide these. > - * with DT probing on ARM, none of these are set. > + * with DT probing on ARM. Did you mean to also get rid of the full-stop on the line before? Thanks, Mark. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.