On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:38:52AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:58:08PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> Device tree naming conventions state that node names should match > >> node function. Change fully functioning clock nodes to match. > >> > >> Also add the output name for pll5 to use as the clock name. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- > >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi > >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi > >> index 3ba2b46..45d5283 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi > >> @@ -50,42 +50,46 @@ > >> clock-frequency = <0>; > >> }; > >> > >> - osc24M: osc24M@01c20050 { > >> + osc24M: clk@01c20050 { > >> #clock-cells = <0>; > >> compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-osc-clk"; > >> reg = <0x01c20050 0x4>; > >> clock-frequency = <24000000>; > >> + clock-output-names = "osc24M"; > >> }; > >> > >> - osc32k: osc32k { > >> + osc32k: clk@0 { > >> #clock-cells = <0>; > >> compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >> clock-frequency = <32768>; > >> + clock-output-names = "osc32k"; > >> }; > >> > >> - pll1: pll1@01c20000 { > >> + pll1: clk@01c20000 { > >> #clock-cells = <0>; > >> compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-pll1-clk"; > >> reg = <0x01c20000 0x4>; > >> clocks = <&osc24M>; > >> + clock-output-names = "pll1"; > >> }; > >> > >> - pll4: pll4@01c20018 { > >> + pll4: clk@01c20018 { > >> #clock-cells = <0>; > >> compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-pll1-clk"; > >> reg = <0x01c20018 0x4>; > >> clocks = <&osc24M>; > >> + clock-output-names = "pll4"; > >> }; > >> > >> - pll5: pll5@01c20020 { > >> + pll5: clk@01c20020 { > >> #clock-cells = <1>; > >> compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-pll5-clk"; > >> reg = <0x01c20020 0x4>; > >> clocks = <&osc24M>; > >> - clock-output-names = "pll5_ddr", "pll5_other"; > >> + clock-output-names = "pll5_ddr", "pll5_other", > >> "pll5"; > > > > Hmmm, I don't really like that bit too much. > > > > This "pll5" clock doesn't actually exist at the hardware point of > > view, which is not really what the DT is used for. > > You are right. pll5 only has 2 outputs. I was matching the format of > pll6, which I'd like to include in this discussion. > > Does pll6 actually have 3 outputs? or are we just using the third > output as a shortcut for mbus input of pll6*2 ?
Hmmm, indeed. I don't really get why pll6 has a third output either. Emilio? -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature