On Wednesday 23 April 2014 17:04:36 Maxime Ripard wrote: > > -static void __init sunxi_dt_init(void) > -{ > - of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL); > -} > - > -static const char * const sunxi_board_dt_compat[] = { > - "allwinner,sun4i-a10", > - "allwinner,sun5i-a10s", > - "allwinner,sun5i-a13", > - NULL, > -}; > - > -DT_MACHINE_START(SUNXI_DT, "Allwinner A1X (Device Tree)") > - .init_machine = sunxi_dt_init, > - .dt_compat = sunxi_board_dt_compat, > -MACHINE_END > - > static const char * const sun6i_board_dt_compat[] = { > "allwinner,sun6i-a31", > NULL,
I'd like to hear more opinions on this. We could either rely on the generic code, or we could keep the entry with just the .dt_compat line and the name, so /proc/cpuinfo contains a meaningful platform name. Either approach works for me, but I think we should do this consistent across platforms. Olof, do you have an opinion? Arnd -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.