On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 06:14:31PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 27.05.2014 10:07, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org>
> >>
> >> The sunxi pinctrl irq chip driver does not support wakeup at the
> >> moment. Adding IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE lets the irqs work with
> >> drivers using wakeup.
> >>
> >> Also add a name to the irq chip.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org> Signed-off-by: Hans
> >> de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> ---
> >> drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2
> >> insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> >> b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c index db9ccd6..ec60c2e
> >> 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c +++
> >> b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c @@ -646,6 +646,8 @@
> >> static struct irq_chip sunxi_pinctrl_irq_chip = { .irq_mask_ack =
> >> sunxi_pinctrl_irq_mask_ack, .irq_unmask =
> >> sunxi_pinctrl_irq_unmask, .irq_set_type =
> >> sunxi_pinctrl_irq_set_type, + .name = "sunxi-pio", +
> >> .flags =
> >> IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> >
> > I'd rather see the name set to dev_name() or something like that.
> > This will not work that great with multiple pin controller
> > supporting interrupts.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've always thought that struct irq_chip
> describes a class of IRQ controllers, not particular instances.It's not said as such in <linux/irq.h>, but maybe.. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
