On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 09:54:04PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > I want simplefb to run, which means having the clocks enabled, but > that code isn't going to be merged as is.
Could you tell me again why you were surprised that i only sent this to linux-sunxi? > How would you represent a single register controling 32 gates then? > with 32 nodes? Be reasonable. > > We have to have an ID. We chose for that ID to have the one described > in the datasheet. What fools we make.... > And I'm supposed to catch all your typos then? > Again, nothing to do with the clocks property. Could we *please* get > to *a* point? Any point would do, but really, get your facts together. > Still nothing to do with the clocks property. > Yes, and? > We are neither name driver nor bit driven, we are phandle driven. Like > I said above, exposing a register controlling 32 gates would then > require to create 32 nodes. For sanity reasons, we chose to add an > extra argument. Just like it's already used for interrupts, reset > lines, gpios, pretty much every thing. > The bitmask here is to make sure we don't get an invalid clock ID, and > be able to deal with "holes" in our register. In time. Luc Verhaegen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
