Rob, seeing as we disagree on patch #5, do you have time to discuss this evening, or tomorrow?
g. On 12 Nov 2014 14:56, "Grant Likely" <grant.lik...@linaro.org> wrote: > [Replying on-list and with original ccs] > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 11/11/2014 10:42 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > >> - clocks : List of clocks used by the framebuffer. Clocks listed here > >> are expected to already be configured correctly. The OS must > >> ensure these clocks are not modified or disabled while the > >> simple framebuffer remains active. > > > > Updated in my local tree, where I've also added proper commit messages > > to the 2 patches missing them. Shall I send a v5 of the set, and may I > > add your Acked-by to this patch when sending v5? > > For this whole series, please add my Acked-by. > > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org> > > I'm okay with the bindings, and I'm okay with adding the clock > dependency to a simplefb node. I'm happy with the conversation we had > today on IRC, and I'm expecting to see a binding that covers expected > firmware/OS behaviour and association with the real hardware posted to > the list shortly. > > g. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
