The composite clock didn't have any unregistration function, which forced
us to use clk_unregister directly on it.
While it was already not great from an API point of view, it also meant
that we were leaking the clk_composite structure allocated in
clk_register_composite.
Add a clk_unregister_composite function to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
index 1f903e1f86a2..b0f3b84ebd13 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
@@ -286,3 +286,18 @@ err:
kfree(composite);
return clk;
}
+
+void clk_unregister_composite(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ struct clk_composite *composite;
+ struct clk_hw *hw;
+
+ hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
+ if (!hw)
+ return;
+
+ composite = to_clk_composite(hw);
+
+ clk_unregister(clk);
+ kfree(composite);
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
index da95258127aa..26a8c9b7be71 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
@@ -603,6 +603,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_composite(struct device *dev,
const char *name,
struct clk_hw *rate_hw, const struct clk_ops *rate_ops,
struct clk_hw *gate_hw, const struct clk_ops *gate_ops,
unsigned long flags);
+void clk_unregister_composite(struct clk *clk);
/***
* struct clk_gpio_gate - gpio gated clock
--
2.7.3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
