On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:55:10 -0700 Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 03/30, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > @@ -74,6 +74,23 @@ enum pwm_polarity { > > PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED, > > }; > > > > +/** > > + * struct pwm_args - PWM arguments > > + * @period: reference period > > + * @polarity: reference polarity > > + * > > + * This structure describe board-dependent arguments attached to a PWM > > s/describe/describes/ > > > + * device. Those arguments are usually retrieved from the PWM lookup table > > or > > + * DT definition. > > + * This should not be confused with the PWM state: PWM args not > > representing > > s/not representing/don't represent/ ? > > > + * the current PWM state, but the configuration the PWM user plan to use > > s/plan/plans/ > > > + * on this PWM device. > > + */ > > +struct pwm_args { > > + unsigned int period; > > + enum pwm_polarity polarity; > > +}; > > + > Will fix these errors. Thanks, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.