On 09/09/16 21:10, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi Maxime,
> From: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
>
> The Allwinner A64 SoC is a low-cost chip with 4 ARM Cortex-A53 cores
> and the typical tablet / TV box peripherals.
> The SoC is based on the (32-bit) Allwinner H3 chip, sharing most of
> the peripherals and the memory map.
> Although the cores are proper 64-bit ones, the whole SoC is actually
> limited to 4GB (including all the supported DRAM), so we use 32-bit
> address and size cells. This has the nice feature of us being able to
> reuse the DT for 32-bit kernels as well.
> This .dtsi lists the hardware that we support so far.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
> [Maxime: Convert to CCU binding, drop the MMC support for now]
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt | 1 +
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 279
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 281 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt
> index 7e79fcc36b0d..7e59d8ba86af 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt
> @@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ using one of the following compatible strings:
> allwinner,sun8i-a83t
> allwinner,sun8i-h3
> allwinner,sun9i-a80
> + allwinner,sun50i-a64
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 20bb1d00098c..c8c0c85c113f 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ M: Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org>
> L: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> S: Maintained
> N: sun[x456789]i
> +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/
If you promise to not break it needlessly ;-)
>
> ARM/Allwinner SoC Clock Support
> M: Emilio López <emi...@elopez.com.ar>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..028cdbee20aa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 ARM Ltd.
> + * based on the Allwinner H3 dtsi:
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Jens Kuske <jensku...@gmail.com>
> + *
> + * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
> + * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
> + * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
> + * whole.
> + *
> + * a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
> + * License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * Or, alternatively,
> + *
> + * b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> + * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
> + * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
> + * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
> + * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
> + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
> + * conditions:
> + *
> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> + * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES
> + * OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
> + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
> + * HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
> + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
> + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun50i-a64-ccu.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/sun4i-a10.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sun50i-a64-ccu.h>
> +
> +/ {
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu@0 {
This is probably me to blame here since I put you up to it, but you need
"cpux" names (e.g. "cpu0: cpu@0 {") to match the ones that the PMU node
references below. dtc will refuse to compile it otherwise.
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + reg = <0>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu@1 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + reg = <1>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu@2 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + reg = <2>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu@3 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + reg = <3>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + osc24M: osc24M_clk {
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> + clock-output-names = "osc24M";
> + };
> +
> + osc32k: osc32k_clk {
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <32768>;
> + clock-output-names = "osc32k";
> + };
> +
> + pmu {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53-pmu", "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 120 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 121 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 122 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 123 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-affinity = <&cpu0>,
> + <&cpu1>,
> + <&cpu2>,
> + <&cpu3>;
> + };
> +
> + psci {
> + compatible = "arm,psci-0.2";
> + method = "smc";
> + };
> +
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13
> + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 14
> + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 11
> + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 10
> + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> + };
> +
> + soc {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + ccu: clock@01c20000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-ccu";
> + reg = <0x01c20000 0x400>;
> + clocks = <&osc24M>, <&osc32k>;
> + clock-names = "hosc", "losc";
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + pio: pinctrl@1c20800 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-pinctrl";
> + reg = <0x01c20800 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_PIO>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + #gpio-cells = <3>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +
> + i2c1_pins: i2c1_pins {
> + allwinner,pins = "PH2", "PH3";
> + allwinner,function = "i2c1";
> + allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>;
> + allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
> + };
> +
> + uart0_pins_a: uart0@0 {
> + allwinner,pins = "PB8", "PB9";
> + allwinner,function = "uart0";
> + allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>;
> + allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
> + };
So did I get this right that there is a strict "no user - no pins"
policy here?
I don't see a reason why we shouldn't have at least the other UART pins
described here as well - since they are a pure SoC property. That would
make it easier for people to enable them (with a simple, scripted fdt
one-liner command in U-Boot, for instance).
I guess there will never be an official DT with more than 2 UARTs
enabled, although we have actually five UARTs on the headers on the
Pine64, for instance (and personally I am looking into using one as a
terminal server).
Also UART1 is connected to that WiFi/Bluetooth slot, having it enabled
should make BT work without further ado (but I haven't tested this).
Thoughts?
> + };
> +
> + uart0: serial@1c28000 {
> + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> + reg = <0x01c28000 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + reg-shift = <2>;
> + reg-io-width = <4>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_UART0>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_UART0>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + uart1: serial@1c28400 {
> + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> + reg = <0x01c28400 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + reg-shift = <2>;
> + reg-io-width = <4>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_UART1>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_UART1>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + uart2: serial@1c28800 {
> + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> + reg = <0x01c28800 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + reg-shift = <2>;
> + reg-io-width = <4>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_UART2>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_UART2>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + uart3: serial@1c28c00 {
> + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> + reg = <0x01c28c00 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + reg-shift = <2>;
> + reg-io-width = <4>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_UART3>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_UART3>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + uart4: serial@1c29000 {
> + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> + reg = <0x01c29000 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + reg-shift = <2>;
> + reg-io-width = <4>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_UART4>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_UART4>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + rtc: rtc@1f00000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-rtc";
> + reg = <0x01f00000 0x54>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 40 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + };
> +
> + i2c0: i2c@1c2ac00 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-i2c";
> + reg = <0x01c2ac00 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_I2C0>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_I2C0>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + i2c1: i2c@1c2b000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-i2c";
> + reg = <0x01c2b000 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_I2C1>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_I2C1>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + i2c2: i2c@1c2b400 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-i2c";
> + reg = <0x01c2b400 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_I2C2>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_I2C2>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + gic: interrupt-controller@1c81000 {
> + compatible = "arm,gic-400";
> + reg = <0x01c81000 0x1000>,
> + <0x01c82000 0x2000>,
> + <0x01c84000 0x2000>,
> + <0x01c86000 0x2000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) |
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + };
This is clearly bike-shedding at this point ;-), but I think the GIC
should belong up into the core peripherals, not under the "soc" node.
> + };
> +};
>
Cheers,
Andre.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
