On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On 14 August 2015 at 01:08, Alex G. <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 08/10/2015 07:54 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >>> On 10 August 2015 at 15:44, Olliver Schinagl <oliver+l...@schinagl.nl> >>> wrote: >>>> Hey Michal, >>>> >>>> As without this patch, we cannot use something like mmc-spi due to the >>>> restriction of packet size iirc. >>> >>> With DMA we can. And since DMA will be enabled most of the time the >>> non-DMA code will receive little or no testing. >>> >> That was also an objection over a year ago, when this patch was first >> ready, and still, no DMA support is implemented. It would be amazing to >> have a way to run larger transfers _today_ :) . > > The dmaengine patch should get into 4.3 probably. >
And here we are again, over one year later, up to 4.9, and still limited to 63 byte transfers. A very smart person just brought this up to me today: " cool, to bad spi does not work properly on allwinner..." Alex > Thanks > > Michal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
