On Samstag, 2. September 2017 00:32:50 CEST André Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/09/17 02:19, Stefan Bruens wrote: > > On Freitag, 1. September 2017 02:31:35 CEST Andre Przywara wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 31/08/17 00:36, Stefan Brüns wrote: > >>> The A64 SoC has the same dma engine as the H3 (sun8i), with a > >>> reduced amount of physical channels. Add the proper config data > >>> and compatible string to support it. > >> > >> ... > >> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c > >>> index 5f4eee4513e5..6a17c5d63582 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c > >>> @@ -1068,6 +1068,12 @@ static struct sun6i_dma_config sun8i_h3_dma_cfg = > >>> { > >>> > >>> .nr_max_vchans = 34, > >>> .dmac_variant = DMAC_VARIANT_H3, > >>> > >>> }; > >>> > >>> + > >>> +static struct sun6i_dma_config sun50i_a64_dma_cfg = { > >>> + .nr_max_channels = 8, > >>> + .nr_max_requests = 27, > >>> + .nr_max_vchans = 38, > >>> + .dmac_variant = DMAC_VARIANT_H3, > >>> > >>> }; > >>> [...] > > There are also the incompatibilities in the "DMA channel configuration > > register" (burst length; burst width; burst length field offset). > > > > We can either have 3 different compatible strings, or another property for > > the register model. > > The latter is usually frowned upon, using separate compatible strings > for each group of SoCs is the way to go here.
Just for clarification, I was not talking about a property in the devicetree, but about a struct member in the config data, i.e. the .dmac_variant above. Kind regards, Stefan -- Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen home: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.