Dne ponedeljek, 21. januar 2019 ob 10:57:57 CET je Chen-Yu Tsai napisal(a): > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:50 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm a bit late to the party, sorry for that. > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 09:56:11AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 1:30 AM Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skra...@siol.net> wrote: > > > > A64 IR is compatible with A13, so add A64 compatible with A13 as a > > > > fallback. > > > > > > We ask people to add the SoC-specific compatible as a contigency, > > > in case things turn out to be not so "compatible". > > > > > > To be consistent with all the other SoCs and other peripherals, > > > unless you already spotted a "compatible" difference in the > > > hardware, i.e. the hardware isn't completely the same, this > > > patch isn't needed. On the other hand, if you did, please mention > > > the differences in the commit log. > > > > Even if we don't spot things, since we have the stable DT now, if we > > ever had that compatible in the DT from day 1, it's much easier to > > deal with. > > > > I'd really like to have that pattern for all the IPs even if we didn't > > spot any issue, since we can't really say that the datasheet are > > complete, and one can always make a mistake and overlook something. > > > > I'm fine with this version, and can apply it as is if we all agree. > > I'm OK with having the fallback compatible. I'm just pointing out > that there are and will be a whole bunch of them, and we don't need > to document all of them unless we are actually doing something to > support them. > > On the other hand, the compatible string situation for IR needs a > bit of cleaning up at the moment. Right now we have sun4i-a10 and > sun5i-a13. As Jernej pointed out, the A13's register definition is > different from A64 (or any other SoCs later than sun6i). So we need > someone with an A10s/A13 device that has IR to test it and see if > the driver or the manual is wrong, and we'd likely add a compatible > for the A20. > > Also, the earlier SoCs (A10/sun5i/A20) have IR TX capability. This > was lost in A31, and also all of sun8i / sun50i. So we're going to > need to add an A31 compatible that all later platforms would need > to switch to.
Actually, A13 also doesn't have IR TX capability. So I still think it's best having A13 compatible as a fallback and not A31. Unless A31 was released before A13? Best regards, Jernej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
