On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:19:16AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > + SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN(G, 10), > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"), > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x1, "gpio_out"), > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "h_i2s2"), /* MCLK */ > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x3, "clock"), /* X32KFOUT */ > + SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ_BANK(0x6, 5, 10)), /* PG_EINT10 */
It looks like there's no i2s vs h_i2s issue anymore? Maybe we can just do s/h_i2s/i2s > + SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN(I, 3), > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"), > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x1, "gpio_out"), > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "emac0"), /* ERXD0 */ > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x3, "dmic"), /* DATA2 */ > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x4, "h_i2s0"), /* DO0 */ > + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x5, "h_i2s0_a"), /* DI1 */ > + SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ_BANK(0x6, 7, 3)), /* PI_EINT3 */ The way we dealt with this for the A100 is that we put the function as a suffix which is more natural, so h_i2s0_dout0 and h_i2s0_din1 Maxime -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20201214094430.m6h3pzhkm3kjl2cl%40gilmour.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
