Hello J�rgen,

Thanks again for your hints.  Sorry to insist, but unfortunately, none of 
these modules is loaded.  I compiled SuSE Kernel 2.2.5 with the parport, 
parport_pc support as modules, as well as for lp support.  So, the 3 modules 
do exist in /lib/modules/2.2.5/... and are loadable without any problems 
(lp + parport) if wished so.  Am I missing something ?  Two questions:

-Is there any other way to get rid of this *%&? parport 0 in /proc/ioports if
it has not been compiled into the kernel and the corresponding modules has 
never been loaded ?

-Is the problem eventually due to some incompatibilities with Kernel 2.2.5 ?

Best regards,
Pierre.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At 18:44 02.06.99 +0200, you wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 04:03:29PM +0200, Pierre Jung wrote:
>
>Hello Pierre,
>
>> 
>> you proposed kindly for solving this detection problem.  Somehow, it
does not
>> want to detect the drive on port 0x378, irq 7 which are set in the BIOS. 
>> Interestingly,in /proc/interrupts, irq 7 DOES NOT APPEAR.  However in
>> /proc/ioports, the unique parallel port appears as 0378-037a : parport
0.  Is
>                                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^
>parport claims ioports ftape wants to access as well.
>Several people have reported problems regarding the interaction between 
>ftape and
>parport, parport_pc. So I would recommend unloading parport_pc and parport 
>before 
>trying to load ftape, zftape and bpck-fdc.  If this unloading fails it may be
>necessary to remove lp as well: 
>
>       modprobe -r lp
>       modprobe -r parport_pc
>       modprobe -r parport
>
>       and now ftape...
>
>
>> there something wrong for not mentionning irq 7 ?  I have no prointer
>
>no, I wouldn't say so. Those irq lines are not always claimed the whole time.
>
>(...)
>> 22:04:13 : [010] 0      fdc-parport.h (ft_parport_claim) - Unable to grab
>> address 0x0378 for <NULL>.
>
>yes, a collision between ftape and parport. Parport has to removed, so that
>ftape/zftape/bpck-fdc can work correctly.
>
>Ok - let's see what the next problems are....
>
>
>Good luck,
>
>Juergen.
>
>-- 
>****************************************************************
>* Juergen Leising; email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
>*          http://www.stud.uni-bayreuth.de/~a0037/             *
>****************************************************************

Reply via email to