Hi,

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 18:10, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Marc Dietrich wrote at Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:50 AM:
>>> On Monday 17 October 2011 08:29:01 Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> > Marc Dietrich wrote at Saturday, October 15, 2011 10:34 AM:
>>> > > Am Samstag 15 Oktober 2011, 17:18:33 schrieb Leon Romanovsky:
>>> > > > This fix updates the CDEV1 pinmux for the paz00 board to be as in the
>>> > > > Harmony board. Paz00 board is originally based on Harmony design.
>>> > >
>>> > > the fact that this patch makes sound work on paz00 does not necessary 
>>> > > mean
>>> > > that this is the "right thing" to do.
>>> > None of the other boards do that, and the drivers don't support it. I
>>> > believe the clock would need to be started as soon as the audio driver
>>> > module were loaded, and kept running as long as it was loaded, so there's
>>> > not much chance of optimizing power here at the moment.
>>>
>>> Which driver?
>>
>> The whole ASoC driver stack. It may depend on the codec, but I assume that
>> CDEV1 clock output should be running the whole time the ASoC codec driver
>> is active. Alsa-devel would be the best place to ask about that kind of
>> thing.
>
> Let's summarize, we agree that it is a correct way to handle CDEV1,
> and it is a correct patch.
> I believe it is a good time to merge the patch before we start to
> merge the codec itself.

It'll be staged for 3.3 when I start those branches, which should be soon.

We're close to the merge window, it's not a regression fix and you
need other changes on top of it anyway to get anything useful out of
it -- so it can wait.

Thank you for posting it early though, and I'll make sure it makes it
into linux-next quickly so you can use that as a base for your codec
work.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to