On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Russell King wrote: > Driver authors seem to get the ordering of irq_set_chained_handler() > and irq_set_handler_data() wrong - ordering the former before the > latter. This opens a race window where, if there is an interrupt > pending, the handler will be called between these two calls, > potentially resulting in an oops. > > Provide a single interface to set both of these together, especially > as that's commonly what is required. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk> > --- > It probably makes sense to convert everything over to this new > registration function, and kill all users of irq_set_chained_handler() > to prevent this problem recurring. Thoughts?
Yes. Classic coccinelle problem. Here is the semantic patch: @@ expression E1, E2, E3; @@ -irq_set_chained_handler(E1, E3); ... -irq_set_handler_data(E1, E2); +irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(E1, E3, E2); This finds and corrects all instances which get it wrong: arch: arm/common/locomo.c | 3 +-- arm/common/sa1111.c | 3 +-- arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c | 4 ++-- avr32/mach-at32ap/extint.c | 3 +-- m68k/mac/psc.c | 12 ++++-------- mips/ath25/ar2315.c | 4 ++-- mips/ath25/ar5312.c | 4 ++-- mips/pci/pci-ar2315.c | 4 ++-- mips/ralink/irq.c | 3 +-- sh/intc/core.c | 5 +++-- drivers: dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c | 6 ++---- gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 5 +++-- gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 10 ++-------- gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 4 ++-- gpio/gpio-msic.c | 3 +-- gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 10 +++++----- gpio/gpio-mxs.c | 4 ++-- gpio/gpio-tegra.c | 4 ++-- gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c | 13 +++++-------- irqchip/irq-keystone.c | 4 ++-- irqchip/spear-shirq.c | 3 +-- mfd/pm8921-core.c | 6 ++---- mfd/t7l66xb.c | 3 +-- mfd/tc6393xb.c | 3 +-- pci/host/pci-keystone.c | 7 +++---- pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 3 +-- pinctrl/pinctrl-adi2.c | 4 ++-- pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 4 ++-- pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 4 ++-- pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c | 3 +-- pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c64xx.c | 8 ++++---- pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 6 +++--- spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 6 ++---- 33 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-) If we revert the search pattern we get the ones which got it right: @@ expression E1, E2, E3; @@ -irq_set_handler_data(E1, E2); ... -irq_set_chained_handler(E1, E3); +irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(E1, E3, E2); That handles another bunch and leaves us with 135 instances of irq_set_chained_handler() which do not set handler data. So its trivial to change them to irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, handler, NULL); and then remove irq_set_chained_handler() If thats ok for you, then i apply the lot you sent and run the cocci scripts right at rc1. I have another set of transformations in that area pending. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html