On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Russell King wrote:

> The gemini code was installing its chained interrupt handler (which
> enables the interrupt) before it was setting its data, which is bad if
> the IRQ was previously pending.  Avoid this problem by converting it to
> irq_set_chained_handler_and_data().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
> Depends on patch 1.
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c
> index f8cb5710d6ee..3292f2e6ed6f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c
> @@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ void __init gemini_gpio_init(void)
>                       set_irq_flags(j, IRQF_VALID);
>               }
>  
> -             irq_set_chained_handler(IRQ_GPIO(i), gpio_irq_handler);
> -             irq_set_handler_data(IRQ_GPIO(i), (void *)i);
> +             irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(IRQ_GPIO(i), gpio_irq_handler,
> +                                              (void *)i);
>       }
>  
>       BUG_ON(gpiochip_add(&gemini_gpio_chip));
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> 
Acked-by: Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kr...@googlemail.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to