On 29 June 2015 at 11:00, Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 09:09:29AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On 21 May 2015 at 03:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 04:49:12 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> >> This callback is expected to do the same as enter() but it has to
>> >> guarantee that interrupts aren't enabled at any point in its execution,
>> >> as the tick is frozen.
>> >>
>> >> It will be called when the system goes to suspend-to-idle and will
>> >> reduce power usage because CPUs won't be awaken for unnecessary IRQs.
>> >>
>> >> By setting the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag, we can reuse the same code
>> >> for both the enter() and enter_freeze() callbacks.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.viz...@collabora.com>
>> >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
>> >
>> > Makes sense to me, but I suppose it should go in via arm-soc.
>>
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> what's the plan regarding merging of this patch?
>>
>> It needs df8d9ee ("cpuidle: Run tick_broadcast_exit() with disabled
>> interrupts") so it doesn't break boot.
>
> By the looks of it the above patch was merged in 4.1, so I can easily
> take this through the Tegra tree. The commit message doesn't say whether
> or not this fixes a bug. Is this urgent? Should it go into 4.2? It
> sounds more like it's a power-saving feature, so 4.3 is probably more
> appropriate.Yeah, it doesn't fix any bug and its effect should only be reduced power consumption when in suspend-to-idle. Thanks, Tomeu > Thierry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
