> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jimmy Zhang
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 7:02 PM
> To: 'Stephen Warren'
> Cc: Allen Martin; Stephen Warren; linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [cbootimage PATCH v5 1/5] Add support for update pubkey and
> rsa-pss signatures
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swar...@wwwdotorg.org]
> > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 3:49 PM
> > To: Jimmy Zhang
> > Cc: Allen Martin; Stephen Warren; linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [cbootimage PATCH v5 1/5] Add support for update pubkey
> > and rsa-pss signatures
> >
> > On 10/09/2015 07:46 PM, Jimmy Zhang wrote:
> > > Create new configuration keywords:
> > >     RsaKeyModulusFile: pubkey modulus
> > >     RsaPssSigBlFile:   bootloader rsa pss signature
> > >     RsaPssSigBctFile:  bct rsa pss signature
> > >
> > > Sample Configuration file update_bl_sig.cfg
> > >     RsaKeyModulusFile = pubkey.mod;
> > >     RsaPssSigBlFile = bl.sig;
> > >
> > > where pubkey.mod and bl.sig are files that contain the public key
> > > modulus and bootloader's rsa-pss signature respectively.
> > >
> > > public key modulus and signature are created through utilities
> > > outside cbootimage.
> > >
> > > Command line example:
> > >   $ cbootimage -s tegra210 -u update_bl_sig.cfg image.bin
> > > image.bin-bl-signed
> > >
> > > Above three new keywords added in this CL are only implemented
> > > support for T210.
> >
> > I'd like to see a changelog per patch so I don't have to refer back to
> > the cover letter each time.
> >
> 
> OK
> 
> > > diff --git a/src/crypto.c b/src/crypto.c
> >
> > > +void
> > > +swap_endianness(
> >
> > Nit: It's more like "byte order" (serialization) rather than
> > endianness, although they're related concepts.
> >
> 
> This is the function name used by tegrasign. I am open if you have a better
> name. The reason for the swap because the string actually is a 256 byte long
> number. Tegra soc handles a number by little endian byte order.
> 
> > > + u_int8_t *out,
> > > + u_int8_t *in,
> >
> > Nit: You could make "in" const to since it's not written.
> >
> 
> OK.
> 

Actually this function allows output pointing to input, ie, reversing itself in 
byte order.

> > > + const u_int32_t size)
> >
> > ... certainly that'd be more useful than making size const.
> >
> > > +{
> > > + u_int32_t i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < size / 2; i++) {
> > > +         u_int8_t b1 = in[i];
> > > +         u_int8_t b2 = in[size - 1 - i];
> > > +         out[i] = b2;
> > > +         out[size - 1 - i] = b1;
> >
> > Nit: It'd be nice to put "size - 1 - i" into a variable rather than
> > duplicate the calculation.
> >

OK

> > > diff --git a/src/set.c b/src/set.c
> >
> > > +int
> > > +set_rsa_param(build_image_context *context, parse_token token,
> > > +         char *filename)
> > > +{
> > > + int     result;
> > > + u_int8_t *rsa_storage;  /* Holds the rsa param after reading */
> > > + u_int32_t size;         /* Bytes to read */
> > > + u_int32_t actual_size;  /* In bytes */
> > > +
> > > + if (g_soc_config->get_value_size == NULL) {
> > > +         printf("Error: get_value_size() is not supported.\n");
> >
> > I think code that calls that function should be able to assume the
> > function pointer is non-NULL. This could be achieved by either having
> > each SoC- specific file provide an implementation of that function.
> > For the SoCs that don't support this, you could share a common dummy
> > implementation that always returns an error.
> >
> 
> OK
> 
> > > diff --git a/src/parse.h b/src/parse.h
> >
> > >           /*
> > > +  * Get the size of specified bct field
> > > +  *
> > > +  * @param id    The parse token
> > > +  * @param data  Return size from bct field
> > > +  * @param bct   Bct pointer
> > > +  * @return 0 and -ENODATA for success and failure
> > > +  */
> > > + int (*get_value_size)(parse_token id,
> > > +                 void *data,
> > > +                 u_int8_t *bct);
> >
> > The existing get/set functions use a void* since they can operate on
> > different fields with different data types. However, the result of
> > retrieving a field's size is always a size_t. The "bct" parameter also
> > doesn't seem to be used; do you think there could ever be a use for it?
> > I think the following prototype should be used so that we can get as
> > much type safety as possible:
> >
> > // Returns >0 for size, -ve for error, never returns 0.
> > size_t (*get_value_size)(parse_token id);
> 
> OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to