The logic for calculating the input rate used when figuring out
the proper dynamic steps for pllx was incorrect. It is supposed to
be calculated using parent_rate / m but it was just using the parent
rate directly, therefore using the wrong step values.

Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
index 2a7faa357130..5d8fac7052f2 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
@@ -780,13 +780,13 @@ static void pllx_get_dyn_steps(struct clk_hw *hw, u32 
*step_a, u32 *step_b)
 {
        unsigned long input_rate;
 
-       if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(hw->clk)) {
+       /* cf rate */
+       if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(hw->clk))
                input_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(clk_hw_get_parent(hw));
-               /* cf rate */
-               input_rate /= tegra_pll_get_fixed_mdiv(hw, input_rate);
-       } else {
+       else
                input_rate = 38400000;
-       }
+
+       input_rate /= tegra_pll_get_fixed_mdiv(hw, input_rate);
 
        switch (input_rate) {
        case 12000000:
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to