On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 8:01 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonx...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 1:10 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonx...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Jason Xing <kernelx...@tencent.com> > > > > When I reviewed other people's patch [1], I noticed that similar thing > > also happens in tcp_event_skb class and tcp_event_sk_skb class. They > > don't print those two addrs of skb/sk which already exist. > > > > They are probably forgotten by the original authors, so this time I > > finish the work. Also, adding more trace about the socket/skb addr can > > help us sometime even though the chance is minor. > > > > I don't consider it is a bug, thus I chose to target net-next tree. > > Gentle ping...No rush. Just in case this simple patchset was lost for > some reason.
This was a conscious choice I think. https://yhbt.net/lore/all/20171010173821.6djxyvrggvaiv...@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com/
