I must have missed something, but...

On 12/10, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>
> @@ -1746,9 +1741,11 @@ static struct mm_struct *dup_mm(struct task_struct 
> *tsk,
>       if (!mm_init(mm, tsk, mm->user_ns))
>               goto fail_nomem;
> 
> +     uprobe_start_dup_mmap();
>       err = dup_mmap(mm, oldmm);
>       if (err)
> -             goto free_pt;
> +             goto free_pt_end_uprobe;
> +     uprobe_end_dup_mmap();
> 
>       mm->hiwater_rss = get_mm_rss(mm);
>       mm->hiwater_vm = mm->total_vm;
> @@ -1758,6 +1755,8 @@ static struct mm_struct *dup_mm(struct task_struct *tsk,
> 
>       return mm;
> 
> +free_pt_end_uprobe:
> +     uprobe_end_dup_mmap();

if dup_mmap() fails and "mm" is incomplete, then with this version dup_mmap_sem
is dropped before __mmput/exit_mmap/etc. How can this help?

Oleg.


Reply via email to