On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 06:31:22PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > +static int unwind_deferred_request_nmi(struct unwind_work *work, u64 
> > *cookie)
> > +{
> > +   struct unwind_task_info *info = &current->unwind_info;
> > +   bool inited_cookie = false;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   *cookie = info->cookie;
> > +   if (!*cookie) {
> > +           /*
> > +            * This is the first unwind request since the most recent entry
> > +            * from user.  Initialize the task cookie.
> > +            *
> > +            * Don't write to info->cookie directly, otherwise it may get
> > +            * cleared if the NMI occurred in the kernel during early entry
> > +            * or late exit before the task work gets to run.  Instead, use
> > +            * info->nmi_cookie which gets synced later by get_cookie().
> > +            */
> > +           if (!info->nmi_cookie) {
> > +                   u64 cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> > +                   u64 ctx_ctr;
> > +
> > +                   ctx_ctr = __this_cpu_inc_return(unwind_ctx_ctr);
> 
> __this_cpu_inc_return() is *NOT* NMI safe IIRC.

Hm, I guess I was only looking at x86.

-- 
Josh

Reply via email to