On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 06:31:22PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > +static int unwind_deferred_request_nmi(struct unwind_work *work, u64 > > *cookie) > > +{ > > + struct unwind_task_info *info = ¤t->unwind_info; > > + bool inited_cookie = false; > > + int ret; > > + > > + *cookie = info->cookie; > > + if (!*cookie) { > > + /* > > + * This is the first unwind request since the most recent entry > > + * from user. Initialize the task cookie. > > + * > > + * Don't write to info->cookie directly, otherwise it may get > > + * cleared if the NMI occurred in the kernel during early entry > > + * or late exit before the task work gets to run. Instead, use > > + * info->nmi_cookie which gets synced later by get_cookie(). > > + */ > > + if (!info->nmi_cookie) { > > + u64 cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); > > + u64 ctx_ctr; > > + > > + ctx_ctr = __this_cpu_inc_return(unwind_ctx_ctr); > > __this_cpu_inc_return() is *NOT* NMI safe IIRC.
Hm, I guess I was only looking at x86. -- Josh