From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

When unloading module, the tprobe events are not correctly cleaned
up. Thus it becomes `fprobe-event` and never be enabled again even
if loading the same module again.

For example;

 # cd /sys/kernel/tracing
 # modprobe trace_events_sample
 # echo 't:my_tprobe foo_bar' >> dynamic_events
 # cat dynamic_events
t:tracepoints/my_tprobe foo_bar
 # rmmod trace_events_sample
 # cat dynamic_events
f:tracepoints/my_tprobe foo_bar

As you can see, the second time my_tprobe starts with 'f' instead
of 't'.

This unregisters the fprobe and tracepoint callback when module is
unloaded but marks the fprobe-event is tprobe-event.

Fixes: 57a7e6de9e30 ("tracing/fprobe: Support raw tracepoints on future loaded 
modules")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
---
 Changes in v2:
   - Do not use unregister_trace_fprobe() but directly unregister
     fprobe and tracepoint in the callback.
---
 kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
index e27305d31fc5..88a80953ae5e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
@@ -1008,10 +1008,13 @@ static int __tracepoint_probe_module_cb(struct 
notifier_block *self,
                                        reenable_trace_fprobe(tf);
                        }
                } else if (val == MODULE_STATE_GOING && tp_mod->mod == tf->mod) 
{
-                       tracepoint_probe_unregister(tf->tpoint,
+                       unregister_fprobe(&tf->fp);
+                       if (trace_fprobe_is_tracepoint(tf)) {
+                               tracepoint_probe_unregister(tf->tpoint,
                                        tf->tpoint->probestub, NULL);
-                       tf->tpoint = NULL;
-                       tf->mod = NULL;
+                               tf->tpoint = TRACEPOINT_STUB;
+                               tf->mod = NULL;
+                       }
                }
        }
        mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);


Reply via email to