On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 20:02, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:42:42 +0530 > Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 17:01, Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Regressions on arm the shmobile_defconfig builds failed with clang-20 and > > > gcc-13 > > > > > > First seen on the next-20250312 > > > Good: next-20250311 > > > Bad: next-20250312 .. next-20250319 > > > > > > Regressions found on arm: > > > - gcc-13-shmobile_defconfig > > > - gcc-8-shmobile_defconfig > > > - clang-20-shmobile_defconfig > > > > > > Regression Analysis: > > > - New regression? Yes > > > - Reproducible? Yes > > > > > > Build regression: arm shmobile_defconfig trace.c undefined type 'struct > > > module' > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]> > > > > Anders bisected this build regression to the following commit, > > > > # first bad commit: > > [dca91c1c54686914dec4dabea8bae4f365c02007] > > tracing: Have persistent trace instances save module addresses > > > > Lore link, > > - > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca+g9fys62qxt1pajep2a8uumqfeasc2jbv2wuspbaxz_hff...@mail.gmail.com/ > > The fix should have been pushed to linux-next already. > > Could you test the latest linux-next?
The reported issue is fixed on tag: next-20250324. Please refer below link for more details, Link: - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20250324/testrun/27735288/suite/build/test/gcc-13-shmobile_defconfig/history/ - Naresh
