On 04/02, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > --- a/kernel/exit.c > +++ b/kernel/exit.c > @@ -937,12 +937,12 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code) > > tsk->exit_code = code; > taskstats_exit(tsk, group_dead); > + trace_sched_process_exit(tsk, group_dead); > > exit_mm(); > > if (group_dead) > acct_process(); > - trace_sched_process_exit(tsk);
I see nothing wrong in this change. (and I think that the current placement of trace_sched_process_exit() was more or less "random"). Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
