On Fri, 02 May 2025 15:15:52 +0200
Paul Cacheux via B4 Relay <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Paul Cacheux <[email protected]>
> 
> Make sure trace_probe_log_clear is called in the tracing
> eprobe code path, matching the trace_probe_log_init call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cacheux <[email protected]>

Looks good to me.

Fixes: 7491e2c44278 ("tracing: Add a probe that attaches to trace events")
Cc: [email protected]

Thank you,

> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c
> index 
> c08355c3ef32b4124ac944d7e3a03efb66492269..916555f0de811f03feed9d923c63078b0e4c993b
>  100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c
> @@ -969,10 +969,13 @@ static int __trace_eprobe_create(int argc, const char 
> *argv[])
>                       goto error;
>               }
>       }
> +     trace_probe_log_clear();
>       return ret;
> +
>  parse_error:
>       ret = -EINVAL;
>  error:
> +     trace_probe_log_clear();
>       trace_event_probe_cleanup(ep);
>       return ret;
>  }
> 
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

Reply via email to