From: Di Shen <di.s...@unisoc.com>

This reverts commit 4a8f635a60540888dab3804992e86410360339c8.

Althought get_pid_task() internally already calls rcu_read_lock() and
rcu_read_unlock(), the find_vpid() was not.

The documentation for find_vpid() clearly states:

  "Must be called with the tasklist_lock or rcu_read_lock() held."

Add proper rcu_read_lock/unlock() to protect the find_vpid().

Reported-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen....@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Di Shen <di.s...@unisoc.com>
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 187dc37d61d4..0c4b6af10601 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3417,7 +3417,9 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr 
*attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
        }
 
        if (pid) {
+               rcu_read_lock();
                task = get_pid_task(find_vpid(pid), PIDTYPE_TGID);
+               rcu_read_unlock();
                if (!task) {
                        err = -ESRCH;
                        goto error_path_put;
-- 
2.25.1


Reply via email to