On 09/03, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:59:13PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > I am wondering why (with or without this change) perf_uprobe_init() needs > > the additional arguments besides "event". It can look at event->attr.config > > itself? > > > > Same for perf_kprobe_init()... > > I think that's because we define enum perf_probe_config together > with PMU_FORMAT_ATTRs and code for attr->config parsing, which > makes sense to me
Ah, and "enum perf_probe_config" is not exported... Thanks, please forget then. Oleg.
