On Wed, 3 Sep 2025 03:31:31 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > by applying the patch, the issue gone. but since you said this is a > > 'diagnostic > > patch', not sure if it's a real fix. anyway: > > > > Tested-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> > > Thank you very much! This tells me that something on the code path from > the tracepoint to the BPF program needs to have preemption disabled. > I will leave the diagnostic patch in my tree, and will be looking into > what the real fix should be. Was it a BPF program that triggered this? I couldn't get that from the backtrace. Also, is this only a x86 32bit issue? -- Steve
