On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 17:47:50 -0400 Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > iter->evt_cpu = cpu; > > + iter->evt = (struct remote_event_hdr *)&rb_evt->array[1]; > > Hmm, shouldn't this use ring_buffer_event_data(rb_evt) instead? > > If the events get big, then it would be array[2]. But the > ring_buffer_event_data() hides that detail. Ahh, looking at the patch 10, it is always array[1]. Still should use a helper function instead of exposing the internals like this. -- Steve
