On 15.09.25 12:43, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 12:22:07PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
0 -> ~100% used (~0% none)
1 -> ~50% used (~50% none)
2 -> ~25% used (~75% none)
3 -> ~12.5% used (~87.5% none)
4 -> ~11.25% used (~88,75% none)
...
10 -> ~0% used (~100% none)
Oh and shouldn't this be inverted?
0 eagerness = we eat up all none PTE entries? Isn't that pretty eager? :P
10 eagerness = we aren't eager to eat up none PTE entries at all?
Or am I being dumb here?
Good question.
For swappiness it's: 0 -> no swap (conservative)
So intuitively I assumed: 0 -> no pte_none (conservative)
You're the native speaker, so you tell me :)
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
