On 9/26/25 00:02, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Add block trace commands for zone operations. These are added as a
> separate set of 'block trace commands' shifted by 32bit so that they do
> not interfere with the old 16bit wide trace command field in 'struct
> blk_io_trace' action.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/blktrace_api.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  kernel/trace/blktrace.c           | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/blktrace_api.h 
> b/include/uapi/linux/blktrace_api.h
> index d58ef484de49..0f336140ce4e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/blktrace_api.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/blktrace_api.h
> @@ -26,11 +26,22 @@ enum blktrace_cat {
>       BLK_TC_DRV_DATA = 1 << 14,      /* binary per-driver data */
>       BLK_TC_FUA      = 1 << 15,      /* fua requests */
>  
> -     BLK_TC_END      = 1 << 15,      /* we've run out of bits! */
> +     BLK_TC_END_V1   = 1 << 15,      /* we've run out of bits! */
> +
> +     BLK_TC_ZONE_APPEND      = 1 << 16ull,   /* zone append */
> +     BLK_TC_ZONE_RESET       = 1 << 17ull,   /* zone reset */
> +     BLK_TC_ZONE_RESET_ALL   = 1 << 18ull,   /* zone reset all */
> +     BLK_TC_ZONE_FINISH      = 1 << 19ull,   /* zone finish */
> +     BLK_TC_ZONE_OPEN        = 1 << 20ull,   /* zone open */
> +     BLK_TC_ZONE_CLOSE       = 1 << 21ull,   /* zone close */

Isn't it more common/correct to do "1ULL << 21" ?



-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

Reply via email to