On Fri, 2025-10-17 at 09:38 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> Gabriele Monaco <[email protected]> writes:
> > Add a series of tests to validate the RV tracefs API and basic
> > functionality.
>
> Thanks for the writing this test. My bash knowledge is not great, and
> I'm not familiar with the existing ftrace test, so I am not able to
> review all the details. But looks good as far as I can tell:
>
> Acked-by: Nam Cao <[email protected]>
Thanks for the ack!
I think that's good for now as it's going to go to Steve as a next step anyway.
I'm going to send a V2 with the following change just to increase the likelihood
of a wwnr reaction and prepare a PR.
I'll keep your ack there unless you explicitly mean otherwise.
Thanks,
Gabriele
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/verification/test.d/rv_wwnr_printk.tc
b/tools/testing/selftests/verification/test.d/rv_wwnr_printk.tc
index bc0b2668bf7c..5a59432b1d93 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/verification/test.d/rv_wwnr_printk.tc
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/verification/test.d/rv_wwnr_printk.tc
@@ -4,9 +4,10 @@
# requires: available_reactors wwnr:monitor printk:reactor stress-ng:program
load() { # returns true if there was a reaction
- local lines_before
+ local lines_before num
+ num=$((($(nproc) + 1) / 2))
lines_before=$(dmesg | wc -l)
- stress-ng --cpu-sched 2 --timer 2 -t 5 -q
+ stress-ng --cpu-sched "$num" --timer "$num" -t 5 -q
dmesg | tail -n $((lines_before + 1)) | grep -q "rv: monitor wwnr does
not allow event"
}
