On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 08:47:12PM -0600, Nico Pache wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 1:00 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > Right, well I agree if we can make this 0/511 thing work, let's do that.
>
> Ok, great, some consensus! I will go ahead with that solution.
:) awesome.
>
> Just to make sure we are all on the same page,
I am still stabilising my understanding of the creep issue, see the thread
where David kindly + patiently goes in detail, I think I am at a
(pre-examining algorithm itself) broad understanding of this.
>
> the max_ptes_none value will be treated as 0 for anything other than
> PMD collapse, or in the case of 511. Or will the max_ptes_none only
> work for mTHP collapse when it is 0.
511 implies always collapse zero/none, 0 implies never, as I understand it.
>
> static unsigned int collapse_max_ptes_none(unsigned int order, bool full_scan)
> {
> unsigned int max_ptes_none;
>
> /* ignore max_ptes_none limits */
> if (full_scan)
> return HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1;
>
> if (order == HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)
> return khugepaged_max_ptes_none;
>
> if (khugepaged_max_ptes_none != HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1)
> return 0;
>
> return max_ptes_none >> (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - order);
> }
>
> Here's the implementation for the first approach, looks like Baolin
> was able to catch up and beat me to the other solution while I was
> mulling over the thread lol
Broadly looks similar to Baolin's, I made some suggestions over there
though!
>
> Cheers,
> -- Nico
Thanks, Lorenzo
