> On Nov 5, 2025, at 4:59 AM, Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> wrote: > > We do not actualy test the bpf_override_return helper functionality > itself at the moment, only the bpf program being able to attach it. > > Adding test that override prctl syscall return value on top of > kprobe and kprobe.multi. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
The test looks good to me. Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]>
