On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 10:22:18 -0800
Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> wrote:

> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
> 
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > index a5a93d243047..754b14ca87a7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > @@ -710,6 +710,8 @@ int trace_event_reg(struct trace_event_call *call,
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> >     case TRACE_REG_PERF_REGISTER:
> > +           if (!call->class->perf_probe)
> > +                   return -ENODEV;

Thanks Namhyung (and Jiri), but this actually already made it upstream as
it was a bug fix and I wanted to get it into the next rc release (rc2).

But, the real fix is having perf be able to handle synthetic_events as real
events.

Can you please review this patch:

  
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/[email protected]/

I plan on queuing that for the next merge window.

Thanks,

-- Steve


> >             return tracepoint_probe_register(call->tp,
> >                                              call->class->perf_probe,
> >                                              call);
> > -- 

Reply via email to