On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 17:20:00 +0100 Marco Crivellari <[email protected]> wrote:
> Before that to happen after a careful review and conversion of each individual > case, workqueue users must be converted to the better named new workqueues > with > no intended behaviour changes: > > system_wq -> system_percpu_wq > system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq > > This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be > removed in the future. > > Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <[email protected]> > --- > kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c > b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c > index 385af8405392..bb6de1d38f78 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c > @@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ static void free_filter_list_tasks(struct rcu_head *rhp) > struct filter_head *filter_list = container_of(rhp, struct filter_head, > rcu); > > INIT_RCU_WORK(&filter_list->rwork, free_filter_list_work); > - queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &filter_list->rwork); > + queue_rcu_work(system_percpu_wq, &filter_list->rwork); This is just garbage collection and has no need to be done on the CPU it was queued on. I guess this can use system_dfl_wq? -- Steve > } >
