Hello Steven, On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 11:11:42AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 12:24:09 +0000 > Mark Rutland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Whoops; s/CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL/PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES/ in both > > places in my reply. > > Note, it could still be useful ;-) > > I've been running my yearly branch profiling build on both my main > workstation and my server. I post the results from my server publicly (this > is updated every night): > > https://rostedt.org/branches/current > > If you check out the branch_annotated file, you can see there's still quite > a bit that gets it wrong. Some of these is because of bad assumptions by > the developer, others is because the code moved around causing new branches > to make later annotated branches go the opposite way.
I am starting to look and remove some of these likely/unlikely hint that are 100% wrong on some very sane configuration (arm64 baremetal hosts running a webserver). So far, these are the fixes I have in flight now. * https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ * https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ * https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
