Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> writes: > On 2026-01-11 12:48, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 10:02:46 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Notable changes for v12: >>> >>> - Reduce per-CPU counters memory allocation size to sizeof long >>> (fixing mixup with sizeof intermediate cache line aligned items). >>> - Use "long" counters types rather than "int". >>> - get_mm_counter_sum() returns a precise sum. >>> - Introduce and use functions to calculate the min/max possible precise >>> sum values associated with an approximate sum. >> May I ask, as an early adopter, what is your overall impression of >> the Gemini reviewbot? > > The review comments were all spot-on. This is the level of review I > would expect from a good reviewer who spends a significant amount of > effort digging into the proposed change to make sure the type limits > are OK for the intended purpose stated in the commit message and that > the intent stated in comments match the code. > > As a patch author, I find this feedback really useful. Is there > an easy way to get this feedback privately before sending out my > patches ?
If you need to review a limited number of patches, the easiest way to use gemini cli/claude code or similar tools with a consumer grade subscription (most are $20/month these days). I maintain a pre-configured environment for Gemini: [email protected]:rgushchin/kengp.git , but it's not hard to hack something similar for other tools. Thanks!
