On Wed, 29 Apr 2026 at 20:35, Mathieu Desnoyers
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2026-04-29 11:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:43:55 -0400
> > Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl 
> >> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> >> index 4fcc7c58a105..005441233932 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> >> @@ -562,3 +562,4 @@
> >>   469        common  file_setattr                    sys_file_setattr
> >>   470        common  listns                          sys_listns
> >>   471        nospu   rseq_slice_yield                sys_rseq_slice_yield
> >> +472 nospu   stacktrace_setup                sys_stacktrace_setup
> >
> > BTW, I have no idea what "nospu" is. I did some searches for PowerPC and
> > spu vs nospu and the only thing I found was a stackoverflow asking about
> > it, and the response was "don't worry about it".
> >
> > I only picked nospu because I noticed that rseq_slice_yield used it, but
> > that doesn't give me a good feeling that it's correct.
>
> AFAIR PowerPC SPUs are the Cell "Synergistic Processing Units", e.g.
> for Playstation 3.

Exactly. System call numbers are the same for normal (PPU = PowerPC)
CPUs and SPUs, but SPUs don't need all syscalls.  Hence the option to
exclude a syscall for the SPUs by marking it "nospu".

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to