On Sun, May 03, 2026 at 01:35:21PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> You also removed the printing of the folio's PFN. Was this deliberate?
> If so, it merits a mention in the commit description.
>
> Also if you are going to do this (and I suspect we should do this!)
> we don't need to do the folio -> pfn -> page conversion. We can just
> store the folio pointer and print out the folio pointer.
>
Yes, I think printing out the PFN is indeed unnecessary, but miss to
merit a mention in commit messsage. I will remove the unnecessary
conversion and merit a mention in patch v2.
