On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 09:16:38AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Thanks for reporting. A similar problem is pointed by Sashiko [1].
> 
> [1] 
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508-bootconfig_using_tools-v1-0-1132219aa773%40debian.org
> 
> On Fri, 8 May 2026 20:07:25 +0300
> Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hello Masami Hiramatsu,
> > 
> > Commit 51887d03aca1 ("bootconfig: init: Allow admin to use bootconfig
> > for kernel command line") from Jan 11, 2020 (linux-next), leads to
> > the following Smatch static checker warning:
> > 
> >     init/main.c:368 xbc_snprint_cmdline()
> >     use scnprintf() instead of snprintf()
> > 
> > init/main.c
> >     331 static int __init xbc_snprint_cmdline(char *buf, size_t size,
> >     332                                       struct xbc_node *root)
> >     333 {
> >     334         struct xbc_node *knode, *vnode;
> >     335         char *end = buf + size;
> >     336         const char *val, *q;
> >     337         int ret;
> >     338 
> >     339         xbc_node_for_each_key_value(root, knode, val) {
> >     340                 ret = xbc_node_compose_key_after(root, knode,
> >     341                                         xbc_namebuf, 
> > XBC_KEYLEN_MAX);
> >     342                 if (ret < 0)
> >     343                         return ret;
> >     344 
> >     345                 vnode = xbc_node_get_child(knode);
> >     346                 if (!vnode) {
> >     347                         ret = snprintf(buf, rest(buf, end), "%s ", 
> > xbc_namebuf);
> >     348                         if (ret < 0)
> >     349                                 return ret;
> >     350                         buf += ret;
> > 
> > In user space snprintf() can return negative, but in the kernel, no.
> > It returns the number of bytes (not counting the NUL terminator) which
> > would have been copied if there were enough space.  So maybe you want
> > to do something like:
> > 
> >     remain = rest(buf, end);
> >     ret = snprintf(buf, rest(buf, end), "%s ", xbc_namebuf);
> >     if (ret >= remain)
> >             return -ENOSPC;
> 
> Actually, we need to query the length of required buffer size if buf == NULL
> or the buffer size is not enough.
> 
> But as Sashiko pointed, I need to check it with UBSAN. (but I think,
> even if @buf is NULL, the @buf is char *, thus it is safe to add some
> value...)
> 

Sashiko says that pointer math on a NULL is undefined but we do it all
the time in the kernel...  When you are a the 800 pound gorilla, you can
ask compilers to implement features the way you want them to be.  :P

regards,
dan carpenter


Reply via email to