On Wed, 13 May 2026 17:06:10 -0700 SeongJae Park <[email protected]> wrote:
> Btw, if you don't mind, may I ask your opinion about the name having '_v2' > suffix? I chose that as an RFC phase temporal name that doesn't break the > compatibility, planning to give it a better name later. But I start feeling > just extending the original one might be another option because tracepoints > are > not strict stable ABI to my understanding, and the change of the TP_prink > format should be simple enough (append the probe_hits= part) that the user > space could reasonably deal with. It's only a stable ABI if some useful userspace tooling depends on it. Otherwise, feel free to change. Nothing really should be parsing the TP_printk() format part as it is really inefficient to do so. That's why I created libtraceevent and libtracefs to do the parsing of the raw data for you. -- Steve
